Search Site
Menu
Appeals

Appeals

2012

Davidson v. Rubinstein, MD, et al – On June 25, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the judgment (United States District Court for the District of Connecticut) in favor of the defendants, holding that Conn. Gen. Stat. §§ 52-146d and 52-146e must be read in light of the underlying purpose of the psychiatrist-patient privilege, i.e., the need to safeguard confidential communications or records of a patient seeking diagnosis and treatment so as to protect the therapeutic relationship. Thus, it is axiomatic that communications that bear no relationship to the purpose for which the privilege was enacted do not obtain shelter under the statute and are admissible under the normal rules of evidence.

2008

Smith v. Andrews, 289 Conn. 61, 959 A.2d 597 (2008): Supreme Court affirmed defense verdict and rejected claims of failure to show compliance with “national” standard of care.

Russo v. Phoenix Internal Medicine Associates, PC, 109 Conn. App. 80, 87, 950 A.2d 559 (2008): Appellate Court affirmed defense verdict and ruled that cardiologist precluded from testifying about standard of care of internal medicine specialist.

Contact us

Please fill out the form below and one of our attorneys will contact you.

Quick Contact Form

Our Offices
  • Stamford Office
    One Landmark Square, 5th Floor
    Stamford, Connecticut 06901
    Phone: 203-358-9200
    Fax: 203-358-0687
  • New York Office
    The Chysler Center, 405 Lexington Avenue, 26th Floor
    Suite 26001
    New York, New York 10174-2699
    Phone: 212-888-8001
    Fax: 212-888-3331
  • White Plains Office
    50 Main Street, 10th Floor
    White Plains, New York 10606
    Phone: 914-686-6100
    Fax: 914-686-6140